Compass 2008 Data Analysis

Quarterly Reports Other Documents Final Report
March 2009
June 2009
September 2009
Final Report

Primary Investigator

Teresa Adams
Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering
University of Wisconsin – Madison
1415 Engineering Drive, 2205 EH
Madison, WI 53706
adams@engr.wisc.edu

Abstract

Past efforts include data analysis and reporting performance and outcomes for signs, pavement, shoulders, roadsides, drainage, traffic, and bridges. In the 2005 Compass report, measures for bridge inspection and maintenance were added, and historic data was transformed from District to Region-levels. In 2006, Compass reports began presenting trends for pavement condition associated with the agency’s biennial inspection cycle. In addition, the 2006 Compass report took on a slightly more customer-focus by presenting overall results as a report card and by organizing the measures according to their maintenance objectives such as safety, stewardship, and aesthetics.

The primary project deliverables for the Compass 2008 work order include data reduction and preparation of two reports: 1) Compass Wisconsin State Highway 2008 Maintenance, Traffic, and Operations ConditionsExecutive Overview Report and 2) Compass Wisconsin State Highway 2008 Maintenance, Traffic, and Operations Conditions Operational Report on:

  • Shoulders, roadsides, drainage, traffic features (field review data)
  • Signs (SIMS database)
  • Pavement (pavement van data)
  • Bridges (BOS highway structures inventory (HSIS) data)
  • Winter

Objectives

The work plan is patterned after previous years’ efforts with the following particular emphases for advancing the Compass Program.

  • The 2007 Compass reports will be used as a starting template for the 2008 reports. Again, the work plan includes periodic meetings with the WisDOT Compass Program Manager specifically geared to assess and redesign the various component reports. The 2008 analysis and reporting is expected to build and improve upon the 2007 efforts.
  • For 2008, the analysis of bridges will continue to be done later in the schedule (after pavements). This is compatible with the business processes in the bridge section. The state’s bridge report is due to FHWA by April 1. By waiting until that date to retrieve bridge data for Compass analysis, we can be confident of using the most up-to-date bridge inspection data.
  • The 2008 work plan will continue developing the new approach for reporting pavement data on 2-year cycles.

Overarching research objectives including the following:

  • Work with the Compass Program Manager and other Compass team members to create useful and meaningful measures for understanding and changing maintenance conditions.
  • Work with the Compass Program Manager and BHO managers to assess, revise, and develop the analysis and reporting procedures used for Compass.

Tasks

  1. Project kick-off
  2. Draft Compass 2008 Report on Winter
  3. Draft Compass 2008 Report on Signs
  4. Compass 2008 Field Review Report
  5. Quality Assurance Analysis
  6. Compass 2008 Report on Pavement
  7. Compass 2008 Report on Bridges
  8. Assemble Compass 2008 Executive Overview and Operational Reports
  9. Analyis of Sample Size

Project Information

  • Duration: 10 months
  • Dates: December 1, 2008 – September 30, 2009
  • Budget: $51,500
  • Student Involvement: One graduate student
  • Modal Orientation: Highway
  • Project ID: CFIRE 03-03
Print Friendly